- Gnome Stew - https://gnomestew.com -

The Villain’s Adventure: A Creative Way to Oppose the PCs

Of the many ways to give the big villains in your campaign depth and make them fun for the PCs to go up against, one of my favorites is having a developed set of motivations and other cues for the villain. If you know what the villain wants, what they’re like, and how they approach the world, you can switch into “PC mode” when you’re planning or when your players surprise you.

In other words, you can play your most important villains just like your players play their PCs: Develop a complete character, and then just react. You don’t have to know every detail of the villain’s plan, you just have to have a basis for deciding what he might do in any given situation. (Which, incidentally, is a major reason the NPCs in Masks: 1,000 Memorable NPCs for Any Roleplaying Game [1] are written the way they are!)

But what if that’s not your cup of tea? What if that doesn’t give you enough to go on, or you’re good at improvisation but not necessarily wired for that particular kind of improvisation?

If that sounds like you, I have an idea to share: the villain’s adventure. I haven’t tried this, but conceptually I like it — and I’m curious what you think of the idea.

The villain’s adventure

At its core, the villain’s adventure is a pretty simple idea:

  1. Write an adventure for the PCs
  2. …And then write the same adventure for the main villain

For #1, just prep however you normally prep, whether that’s a scene-by-scene outline, a network diagram of possible encounters, or writing a traditional linear adventure. You don’t have to anything differently than you usually do.

For #2, shift your perspective. Pretend that the villain is the only PC in a solo campaign, and write the same adventure from her point of view.

That could take a lot of different shapes, depending on the nature of the PCs’ adventure. For example:

You’re not actually going to run the villain’s adventure per se — you’re just going to use it as a loose script, an outline, a battle plan, and a tool for improvisation.

OK, now what?

Now you have two adventures: one for the PCs, prepped as normal and to be run as normal, and one for the villain, which should be a sort of “dark mirror” of the PCs’ adventure.

If the PCs change course and veer into unplanned territory, you’ll still know what the villain is up to because you have a whole outline just for him. If the PCs take a long time resolving a timed encounter, you know what that time means to the villain — she’ll get further through her adventure, likely making things harder for the PCs.

But most importantly, if you need a credible, believable, enjoyable reason for the villain to do or not do something, you don’t have to come up with it on the fly — you’ve probably come up with it already. The villain’s adventure can’t address every possible scenario, but since it was prepared in concert with (but after) the PCs’ adventure, it should cover a lot of ground.

Putting it into practice

If I give this a shot, I’ll look for an adventure with a timeline of some sort, and reverse the timeline for the villain’s adventure. When the PCs are working on “A,” the villain will be starting with “Z” — where they meet will depend on what the PCs do, how long it takes, and how thoroughly they mess up the villain’s plan.

I might also try it over a longer timeframe, with the villain’s adventure spanning several sessions of PC adventures — a story arc, let’s say. That way I’ll know what the villain is doing in the background, and if the PCs unexpectedly interact with the villain at any point during their adventures, I’ll be prepared with a fun response.

That’s just me, though — how might you use this idea? Or is it too oddball to even consider?

9 Comments (Open | Close)

9 Comments To "The Villain’s Adventure: A Creative Way to Oppose the PCs"

#1 Comment By danroth On October 17, 2011 @ 5:51 am

That’s an interesting idea. I think it would work better as a more long-term thing, like you suggested at the end.

However, I think there is a danger of becoming to attached to your villain and working with it so that (s)he gets the upper hand every time. This isn’t something inherently wrong with the Villain Adventure, but a danger because we’re human.

#2 Comment By Martin Ralya On October 17, 2011 @ 8:22 pm

[2] – You’re probably right about the Villain’s Story Arc working better than the Villain’s Adventure — we’ll never know until someone tests it out!

And you’re definitely right about the danger of having a pet villain, though I’d say the danger is lower than that of a GMPC becoming a problem. Your players won’t mind if you keep a good villain around perhaps a bit too long — although obvious abuses are an obvious exception.

#3 Comment By Razjah On October 17, 2011 @ 10:24 pm

This would be cool if a player who was involved in a long running campaign has to drop because of some reason like work, moving, a baby, etc. You can keep that player involved by having him or her run the villain. Because a lot of this is non-combat it can be run easily even online if there are distance problems that made the player leave.

#4 Comment By Redcrow On October 18, 2011 @ 12:42 am

I don’t usually go to quite that extent with mapping out the villains precise path during each adventure. Usually I just keep in mind the villains reactions to whatever the PCs have done at the end of each stage of the campaign. Each subsequent adventure often then involves dealing with the villains counter-move to whatever it was the PCs did during the last adventure.

I don’t usually have difficulty letting my villains die. In fact I rather like seeing them die in spectacular fashion. Therein lies my only real problem with PCs killing my villains… I want them to die an epic death and not a cheap and easy one. That doesn’t mean the villain necessarily needs to be uber powerful as sometimes its the battle to get to the villain that is the epic part and actually taking out the villain is merely the final blow of the battle.

#5 Comment By Sunyaku On October 18, 2011 @ 5:17 pm

I certainly think this is a good idea for long-term villains… particularly those who are integral to the main adventure arc. As players succeed in their endeavors, the villain must modify their plans (or “adventure”, if you want to call it that) to compensate.

#6 Comment By danroth On October 18, 2011 @ 6:41 pm

Another thing to think about is how the villain would get the information. This may not be an issue in more modern or futuristic settings, but I play mainly fantasy games; it could potentially take months for information to travel! Perhaps this would lead to the villain making a poor (or luckily fantastic) decision, simply because of an incomplete idea of what the characters are up to.

#7 Comment By Martin Ralya On October 18, 2011 @ 7:42 pm

[3] – That would dovetail nicely with my Evil Overlords concept, available as a [4] (from the dawn of time, 2007!). The PDF includes the concept article plus a case study by a friend who actually tried it (with me as an overlord). Fun stuff.

#8 Comment By Razjah On October 19, 2011 @ 7:35 am

I knew I remembered something like that. Thanks for the link.

#9 Pingback By News from Around the Net: 21-OCT-2011 (Sponsored by Escape Velocity Gaming) | Game Knight Reviews On October 21, 2011 @ 5:04 am

[…] It’s good to have a foil for the players. So why not let the bad guy have an adventure too? Martin Ralya at Gnome Stew proposes that GMs play their most important villains like the players pla…. And I think this is a brilliant idea! If nothing else, it can help you fill in an adventure from a […]

#10 Comment By Greg On October 24, 2011 @ 7:21 am

We did this, back in 2nd edition. The villain, Oratan, did a lot of stuff that the PCs never even knew. He animated undead sheep, cows, and a raccoon. On the end, he perma-killed two PCs. It worked well.