- Gnome Stew - http://www.gnomestew.com -

Seizing the reins: One Shot adventures

Posted By Scott Martin On May 28, 2008 @ 6:46 am In GMing Advice | 7 Comments

“As you leave the train station, you notice something is missing: the street is surprisingly quiet. A moment later there’s a screech of wheels and the sound of a tommy gun…”

When I met Bryan and Paul for the first time at the local game store’s meetup, everything clicked. In a lot of ways, it was pure luck. Bryan had heard about Spirit of the Century and was interested in trying it out. I’d been lurking on the FATE mailing list, learning, and waiting for a chance to try out this cool system I’d bought. We all showed up open to a new experience– more, we were each really looking for an chance to get out of our current play pattern. The positive attitudes combined with a system that matched what we were looking for that day and forged friendships. I can’t promise that one shots always work out that way… but mastering them is a valuable skill.

When you’re pitching a new game to your group, a one-shot is a good way to try it without committing to an indefinite campaign. If you’re looking at adding a new player to an established group, a one-shot is a safe way to get everyone playing on the same page… it’s hard to convince new players to read five years of campaign logs before they ever experience your group. Cons are almost all one shot adventures; the few exceptions are usually linked series of one-shots. [Note: I'm using one-shot to mean a single adventure-- you might play it out over a few nights, but it's short and focussed.]

What to look for when prepping a one-shot:

  • Characters, ready to play or quick to develop. This is so that the players get to spend their time playing, rather than creating characters.
  • A system that’s quick to learn. If you’re creating the characters in advance, it doesn’t matter how convoluted the character generation rules are– the rules in the game, during scenarios, are the ones the players will see.
  • An unusual experience, something you can’t fit easily into a longer game. This one is optional; I like it when one-shots, particularly in systems we already know, offer a different experience. A full campaign might constrain your crazy ideas, but one shots give you a chance to do something unique.
  • A strong plot or a strong sense of direction. This is important; the players should get to see the exciting parts of the game and enjoy them. Strong direction can make sure they get to see the cool bits in the sample– and limits how much you have to prepare.
  • Handouts or quick references, to help players with the new rules. While not necessary when you’re playing a one-shot of a system everyone already knows– it’s often very helpful. When a player chooses a new role, even in a familiar system different rules often come to the forefront. A spell-caster and a front-line fighter often have very different rules they’ve mastered over a campaign.

For the example above, Spirit filled the above roles handily. Lurking on the mailing list, I noticed excellent quick references, snatched them up, and brought printouts. Spirit is intended for pickup play, but our game got off to an even faster start when the players picked pre-generated characters instead of building their own.

In retrospect, the game demanded a lot of improvisational skill of the GM. The scenario I’d designed didn’t imagine some of the inventive turns the players took. Fortunately, the characters had plots built into them [via Aspects], which helped when it came time to improvise. When they bailed out of the airship and decided to travel to Chicago their own way, Jet Black’s rival [listed on his character sheet] caught my attention. Rocket Red’s interference made perfect sense for the travel scene…

Their character determines how they’ll see the game:
The characters are the players’ interface. If the rules encourage something (like martial arts) but it doesn’t show up on a character sheet, the players won’t know about it. If there’s something you want to show off about the game or setting, make sure it’s directly involved in a character or two. If you’re making the characters in advance (which is required to play quickly in most games), make sure you include the cool parts of in the PC sheets.

If you’re introducing a group to the game, you’ll also want to highlight what the ability means. If swordsman 3 means the character can perform a devestating riposte, you’ll want to include that information. That way, the player will see why they’d build a character up to swordsman 3. Many systems are complex; without extensive reading ahead of time, it is often difficult to make characters with abilities work the way they want.

One of my most successful pitches was for Mage: The Ascension a decade ago. As I’d do with most systems, I created the characters in advance. I knew that the character sheet alone wouldn’t do a good job of conveying the cool part of the system– and I wanted to highlight some specific components. To make that work, I created a sheet for each character with a paragraph or so of general/adaptable history, and a few examples of spells they’d developed. [Figuring out spells on the fly in the system was tricky without system mastery, though good handouts helped there too.] The snippet of history and personality went a long way in selling the characters. The personal spell examples helped– while they were mechanical examples, listing the character’s “personal favorites” let the mechanical examples show aspects of the character’s personality.

Other advice:
I suspect I could go on forever… but I’d rather prepare a good one-shot. What advice did I overlook? If you’ve prepared one-shots, what tricks do you use? Is there a good way to encourage identification with characters immediately, or is that something that just has to grow out of play?

About  Scott Martin

Scott is an engineer turned gnome and game store owner. He lies awake at night building intriguing worlds and plotting your character's demise.




7 Comments (Open | Close)

7 Comments To "Seizing the reins: One Shot adventures"

#1 Comment By BryanB On May 28, 2008 @ 2:50 pm

Hello Scott. I think you have touched on several good points.

Unless the system supports a very quick generation system or an “on-the-fly” method of generation, a one shot game just about demands that pre-gens be used. I like D&D 3.5, for example, but I don’t want to invest the time necessary to create a good D&D character that I will only use once. That would be about twenty-five percent of my game time spent in character creation… not good.

I think rules light or rules lighter games are more ideal than the medium or heavy rules games both for people new to gaming to learn, or for experienced players to pick up on quickly. D&D 3.5 with pre-gens and a simple straight forward scenario might work for a one-shot, but something like Star Wars Saga Edition or Spirit of the Century would probably work better.

As far as unusual experiences go, Spirit of the Century was (is) primed for that sort of thing. It was geared for wild pulp action goodness where almost anything could happen. Some of the actions that Paul and I took in the game were because it was a one-shot and we felt like fully embracing the genre of pulp action. Why play it safe in a pulp action one-shot? For some reason, we forgot this in our second one-shot, but I digress. With Spirit, it was a combination of rules light and genre that was so suitable for the unusual experience.

For a one shot, I generally follow the KISS rule (Keep it Stupid Simple). Campaigns have time to evolve grand plots which will change the course of nations or empires. One-shots aren’t really geared for that sort of thing. The players should be presented with a simple and fairly straight forward objective that will keep everyone focused. That simple plot should include really nifty parts of the rules such as the nifty chase sequences in SotC, the gritty gunfights of Coyote Trail, or the rich-in-theme morality struggle of Dogs in the Vineyard.

As far as handouts go, I can’t recommend them enough. The at-a-glance handouts for Star Wars Saga Edition or the handout you passed out for SotC are perfect examples for an easy to read, easy to understand, as well as useful tool for teaching the basics of the game. I think these things are important: Easy to read, easy to comprehend, and useful without going overboard. For a game that has lots of skills, letting the players know what those skills do might be good. The players don’t have to know how everything works mechanically, but they do need to have a good idea of what their character can do in the game.

I think that a short background snippet of information can be extremely helpful in getting players into their character. A pre-gen character with stats and skills is just a character sheet. A pre-gen character with the addition of a short bio (a couple of paragraphs at most) and perhaps a few personality notations can be the ticket for a one-shot player to really shine during the game.

#2 Comment By Kurt “Telas” Schneider On May 28, 2008 @ 8:37 pm

Solid advice; I may have to start pulling out all those impulse RPG purchases for one-shots…

If you’re using a familiar system, you don’t necessarily need pregens on a crunch-heavy system. I ran a one-shot with a week’s notice to make up 16th level (D&D 3.5) characters, and we all had a blast.

#3 Comment By age On May 29, 2008 @ 1:57 am

Handouts are the key. Choice of Pre-gen Characters and pre-loaded equipment; an adventure synopsis and a rules-light Quick reference sheet for Players and you’re ready to Rock and roll!

#4 Comment By DarthKrzysztof On May 29, 2008 @ 8:48 am

I always loved Blood Brothers and its sequel, collections of horror movie-inspired scenarios for Call of Cthulhu. Each scenario has a different theme/flavor/inspiration (The severed body part on a rampage! Spaghetti Western horror! Silent expressionist movie! The haunted carnival! Mexican wrestlers!), and is perfect for a one-shot gaming session, with pregen PCs, “trailers,” and everything else you’d need.

I always wanted to use one of these as a standby, but it’s never come up.

#5 Comment By Scott Martin On May 29, 2008 @ 9:18 am

Bryan: Thanks. You’re absolutely right about plotting; KISS should very much be kept in mind when plotting and deciding which subsystems to highlight.

Kurt: If your players are eager to do character generation for a one-shot, you’re in good shape. It can be a lot of fun to tinker with characters, and a one shot like yours gives you a good excuse to do so.

Age: Sounds perfect– quick and easy.

Darth Krzysztof: I haven’t read Blood Brothers, but your idea of running a module for a one shot sounds like both a good way to enjoy a story you’ve read and a good way to try out something new.

#6 Comment By Tommi On June 1, 2008 @ 7:06 am

The first guideline is to cut to the chase; no meaningless meanderings, just the meat of the game.

The second guideline is to make simple characters, both on mechanical and characterisation side. That is, each should have a clear hook that helps in roleplaying it, such as a simple manner and a strong personal goal.

The third guideline is to be enthusiastic. Enthusiasm always helps.

#7 Pingback By Como fazer aventuras para encontros de RPG | D30 On September 19, 2011 @ 1:56 pm

[...] Gnomw Stew: Seizing the reins: One Shot adventures [...]


Article printed from Gnome Stew: http://www.gnomestew.com

URL to article: http://www.gnomestew.com/gming-advice/seizing-the-reins-one-shot-adventures/

All articles copyright by their individual authors. All rights reserved.