This is my favorite Wandering Damage so far, and I like the list format.

I agree that it’s an art form, and I would say that playing a character is also one, but it makes me wonder about the agenda bit…

It seems like there’s a lot of good art that has some agenda to it. Protest songs, spirituals, even graffiti (like this: http://www.flickr.com/photos/filippominelli/2046317179/) all come to mind. If running a game is a legitimate art form, why would games shy away from such topics?

Now, certainly, this is a social contract issue: if your group doesn’t want morally ambiguous moments, or if they think you’re going overboard, that’s another story. But I appreciate the long tradition of speculative fiction exploring and questioning social assumptions, and I like to play with that a bit in my game.

Maybe the difference is in raising questions rather than pushing forward an agenda…

I could get more post-modern and suggest that all created worlds push forward some kind of agenda, it’s just that some are more blatant/conscious than others, but I won’t go into that here.

Re: goofing off
The quote, as stated, strikes me as a bit harsh. Like others have said, most groups accept or even encourage some degree of non-gaming fun at the gaming table. Where it becomes a problem for most groups is when some people want to game at the same time that others want to goof off. That kind of thing can be solved with (everyone together now!) a good social contract.

On the “goofing off” thing: it’s okay to goof off; we all do it.

My BA in Economics just wanted to point out that there is an opportunity cost for doing so.

On the flip-side, I do like to insert some ripped-from-the-headlines type stuff into the game (suicide bombers, terrorism, drug use, etc) since the players can instantly understand and react to it. Still, when I do use these elements, it’s usually with a simplified good vs evil stance to it so the players don’t have to think too much. None of the whole “the kobolds come from an impoverished social class, so it’s not their fault they’ve turned to a life of selling drugs”

Sell drugs = evil = roll for initiative.

I’m of the cheetoism school (We are together to have fun, shoot the breeze and eat snacks together). The gamke used to be a lot more important, but now it’s the social glue that binds us.

It is important… but goofing off (talking about series, movies and watching youtubes) is now part of our experience.

However, goofing off while in the middle of a scene whne most players are ‘in it’ is frowned upon.

That being said, the artist as GM comparaison is pure gold!

That’s true, but I’m not convinced that goofing off at the table is a bad thing. I’m a GM, not a school teacher: if everyone’s having fun talking about the latest episode of Heroes or something I’m not going to get all huffy about it. While I do like to make sure the game keeps moving, I don’t get all “We’re here to play, damnit! We’ve got to cram as much gaming as we can into the session!” – I like to have half an hour of shooting the shit before we get down to business, and I don’t mind if we go off on tangents occasionally (my players are quite good at not doing so in the middle of important scenes, so it’s not atmosphere-wrecking).

The more gaming feels like work, the more we’re missing the point, and having someone coughing and insisting that we stick to the business at hand reminds me of stuffy business meetings.